Minutes Regional Groups 24 Nov 2006 |
| home print |
|---|
Meeting opened with a welcome by Doris Graham (chair) at 0935 Present: Grahame Rogers, Allan Briggs, Alison Russell-French, Ian Hume, Linley Grant, Rob Davis, Graeme Hamilton, Andrew Ley, Tony Grice (minutes) Apologies: Eric Woehler, Mike Weston, Jack Baker, Justin Watson, Dean Ingwersen Doris Graham enquired about the addresses to be used for circulation of newsletters. The meeting agreed that the addresses available on Wingspan were the appropriate ones. AR-F requested that the IBA project be discussed during general business. The meeting reviewed the minutes of the previous minutes. Engagement in the NRM process by Regional Groups. GR indicated that members were being encouraged to apply for funding through the NRM process. LG indicated that Birds Tasmania is actively involved in Tasmanian regional bodies. (In these minutes I have used the expression Regional Group to refer to BA Regional Groups and (NRM) Regional Bodies to refer to the groups that operate the NRM process within the states). AR-F indicated that BA is recognized as a nationally significant organization relevant to NRM interests; she sees important opportunities for more active engagement e.g. surveys in SE Gulf country. AR-F plans to meet with chairs of Queensland regional bodies to raise the BA profile and that the NRM process is likely to be an important source of funding for some years to come. AR-F suggests that Regional Groups could consider identifying bird species, locations and issues around which NRM bodies could be engaged. LG suggests an involvement with NRM meetings by BA Regional Group representatives is likely to lead to useful outcomes. Major conservation issues
GH indicated a need to identify major conservation issues relevant to
birds. We need (both nationally and regionally) to identify priorities.
Waders are a focus that we have strengths and interests in. Woodlands
are arguably the most important habitat. GR suggests each Regional Group should prepare a list of the important conservation issues in their regions and define priorities for BA attention. RG convenors will be responsible for providing this information by April 2007. NO will provide the Regional Groups with a template for submissions in relation to conservation priorities. GH will be responsible for providing this by end of 2006. RD suggests that regional conservation coordinators should meet regularly to more effectively link with activity at the national level. AR-F indicated that it would be very useful in regards engagement with the NRM process if BA had a clear conservation agenda. BA Strategic Plans GH reported indicated that the Strategic Plan is not yet complete. It will be re-formulated following Sunday’s meeting of Council and placed on the web site before the end of 2006. A paper entitled “Who are we?” was circulated as material that may be useful in the interim. Important Bird Areas GH: The IBA technical group met in Darwin earlier this year and made good progress. A number of IBAs came up for approval. Concerns over the rigour of the approval process have been raised at Council and are being considered by the Research and Conservation Committee, prior to an expected wave of IBA nominations in 2007. Rio Tinto is likely to continue its involvement in supporting the IBA project. BA will deliver a “publication” on IBAs in some form though this will not necessarily be in the form of a book as done for other parts of the world. RD indicated that it is important that stakeholders for individual IBAs must be involved in the proposal preparation process. AR-F: governments and NRM bodies should be engaged in the process too. We need to be considering the on-going processes for maintaining IBAs in the longer term. AB: Some important possible IBAs may have been overlooked because they are on private land. RD: Rio Tinto may not support maintenance of IBAs that involve land owned or operated by its competitors. Meeting expenses The meeting agreed that issue of expenses in relation to past meetings is closed. All Regional Group representatives should submit invoices to National Office for reimbursement of their costs in attending today’s meeting. DG indicated that travel expenses to BARG meetings would relate only to the annual meetings in Melbourne. (BA Victoria does not expect travel expenses for RG meetings). Cost of running Regional Groups This issue has been largely covered by the Regional Groups providing NO with budgets. These budgets do not indicate what financial resources they might hope for. GR and AL indicated that their Groups operate within their budget and supplement the funds received from NO through efforts to raise funds through their activities. LG indicted that Birds Tasmania’s requirements are not covered by the amount received from NO. AB said that it costs his group half of its capitation fees to cover its audit fees. DG: BA Vic is a large and financially viable group. In response to advice received the group has been deliberately running down its financial reserves (because BA is a not-for-profit organization). AR-F and GH suggests that this is not necessary and that holding some cash reserves is desirable. Gifts and donations
GR asked for clarification on the question of gifts and donations when
donors ask that their donation be allocated to a specific project.
GH indicated that a donor can state a preference and their donation
will attract a tax deduction. They cannot receive a tax donation for
donations where they absolutely require that their donation go toward
a specific project. The concept of a tax deductible donation is that
the donor will not receive a benefit or a service as a result of their
donation. Charging to conduct surveys
RD: BAWA has decided not to do consultancies. Previously, they charged
consultancy rates. They currently do surveys on a volunteer basis. Financial reporting by RGs GH indicated that RGs have been requested to provide (1) a mid-year Income Statement (end of June) (2) A 9-month Income Statement and forecast end of year operating result (end of October) and (3) a budget for the coming year (also end of October). Policy and Procedures Manual
AL presented a draft of the manual that has not been advanced for some
time (several years). The process has fallen behind the schedule set
at the last meeting. AL will revise the schedule: A draft BA regional conservation groups element of the manual has been prepared. Revision of Regional Groups component of manual: GR will co-ordinate a call for submissions from Regional Groups, requiring a response from them to be sent to AR-F by the end of February 2007. AR-F will collate these submissions (alisonrf@iinet.net .au) and will prepare and provide AL with a revision by the end of March 2007. AL will prepare the revised manual by the end of April 2007 and distribute to RG. The manual will then be considered by the RG meeting in May 2007. There is an issue in relation to Regional Groups using individual logos. RD suggests that Regional Groups should do away with individual logos. AR-F and GH indicate a strong preference for a single logo. If RGs are going to use regional logos the “Emu” logo must always be used in conjunction. NO will provide guidelines in relation to formatting material. RG convenors should take the “one logo” to committees. AL: suggests revision of standard RG names so that we use Birds Australia - “Region” e.g. Birds Australia - North Queensland (“group” will be deleted from the name). Newsletters AR-F requested that each RG send her a copy of their newsletters. Web sites and Regional Groups web page BAWA has its own operational web site. GH indicated that the BA website would be upgraded in 2007 with the intention that Regional Groups can author and upload their own content to the main site. There may be possibilities for attracting external funding for establishing or improving web sites. RG newsletters could be provided through the web sites. Membership campaign GR indicated that a large number of people drop out of membership over time. GH told the meeting that members are reminded when their renewal is due and again 6 months later. AR-F suggested that each new member receive a welcome letter from the President. LG reminded the meeting of the importance of personal contact for new members or potential new members. GH to ensure that the new members pack contains a welcome letter from the President. Calendar There is a clash of timing between the Congress and the AOC. GH indicated that the calendar was developed without sufficient consultation. He has modified some elements of the calendar as necessary as a band aid solution pending a complete revision. The AGM and Member’s Day will be in South Australia in May 2007. The Congress and Campout planned for Tasmania is timed to be very close to the Australasian Ornithological Conference in Perth. There may be other formats for the different meetings to diversify the total package. AR-F suggested dropping the Campout but retaining the Conference in 2007. The Campout could be tied to the Penguin Conference. A possibility is to move the Congress and Campout to a different state. Decision – BA Tasmania is still expecting to organize the Congress in 2007. The date has not been finalized. LG will take these ideas to BA Tasmania. GH asked whether the RGs are in a position to both organize Congresses and have input into AOC. He indicated that in the past Council had decided that AGMs and Members’ Days should be in places that were readily accessible to a majority. GH will revise the calendar in consultation with Regional Groups via GR. Occupational Health and Safety GR distributed an Excursion Risk Assessment form. He suggested that groups discuss OH&S issues prior to undertaking a field activity. GH: Insurance advice is that completion of this type of form is not necessary though he recommends that groups do it anyway. It should become policy. No-one at the meeting saw any real difficulties in adopting such a policy, and its use was approved in principal. GR agreed to make the form that they use available through their web site. Its effectiveness can be monitored and modified. The OH&S committee will consider it for approval. All those attend activities must sign on in order to be involved. Relationship with other bird organisations There is already a good deal of co-operation with other organizations at least in some regions. Sustainable actions
RD: Does BA have sustainable practices in place? Minutes from 2:30 pm by G Rogers. BA Library. Some concern was expressed that the library was to be broken
up when the office moved. Margaret Cameron believes that the library's
first responsibility is to members and then officers, and it has a national
responsibility for unique ornithological material, and that we should
beware of casting out historical and foreign material which is not always
easy to get elsewhere. Privacy. GH: It is assumed that members give their contact details to BA for the purposes of BA, so RGs should feel free to contact their members. Congress 2006. A great success. Held on Thursday and Friday because it was a remote location, for which many of the 136+ attendees would be arranging leave. The budget was set to cover costs, resulting in a surplus of over $2000. Noting the cost of a professionally organised conference, some delegates were of the opinion that a larger surplus should be aimed for, both as a safety cushion and to raise funds for conservation. Comments from the President. Comments from the CEO. The Constitution is being revised, for vote by members in May 2007. Some sections are no longer relevant; one (unneeded) section obliges us to pay pay-roll tax; Council needs to be able to coopt members with expertise not possessed by current members (e.g. in finance management). Draft changes will be available to members for comment soon. Reports from the Regional Groups. Meeting closed at 4:40 pm. Next meeting 25 May Mount Gambier.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# |
Action |
Who |
When |
ü/û |
1 |
circulate the BA submission in relation to the new EPBC Act. |
NO |
|
|
2a |
list of the important conservation issues in each regions with priorities for BA attention |
RG convenors |
Apr 2007. |
|
2b |
template for submissions in relation to conservation priorities. |
CEO |
end 2006 |
|
3 |
re-formulated Strategic Plan on BA website |
|
end 2006 |
|
4 |
invoices to NO for RG meeting costs |
RG delegates |
|
|
5 |
should Regional Groups be authorized to issue receipts for tax deduction purposes? |
CEO |
|
|
6a |
Policy and Procedures manual – comments to Andrew Ley |
anyone |
Jan 2007 |
|
6b |
P&P to Governance Committee |
AL |
mid May |
|
6c |
final draft P&P to Council |
AL |
end May |
|
7a |
call for submissions to President on RG component of P&P |
GR |
Feb 2007 |
|
7b |
collation of submissions on P&P |
AR-F |
Mar 2007 |
|
7c |
revised P&P manual to RGs |
AR-F |
Apr 2007 |
|
7c |
Review of P&P manual |
RG meeting |
May 25 |
|
8a |
Guidelines for use of BA logo |
NO |
|
|
8b |
RGs to consider use of BA logo only |
RG convenors |
|
|
9 |
RG newsletters to be sent to President |
RG |
|
|
10 |
Letter from President in new members pack |
CEO |
|
|
11 |
Congress 2007 time and location |
Birds Tasmania |
immediate |
ü |
12a |
Revision of Calendar of Congresses and Members Days. |
CEO |
immediate |
ü |
12b |
RG feedback on revision |
GR |
|
|
13a |
OHS Excursion Risk Assessment form on BASQ website for trialling by other groups |
GR |
|
|
13b |
?approval Risk Assessment from |
OHS Cttee |
next meet |
|
14 |
Sustainable options. Carbon neutral travel. Policy proposal to BA Council |
CEO |
Jun 2007 |
|